Category Archives: Plantations

UPDATE – Blackwood grower in New Zealand looking for markets

The alternative title for this blog should be “The Failure of Timber Markets”.

Back in August last year I received an email from a blackwood grower in New Zealand who had a blackwood plantation ready to harvest. He was looking for buyers.

Here is his latest email. It makes for depressing reading.

Hi Gordon,

Just wanted to share with you a brief summary of our experience trying to sell tasmanian blackwoods in nz.. its been a difficult and frustrating road. Feel free to share if you like.

So we have reached out to dozens of sawmills, brokers etc in nz with details of our small but ready to fell forest.

(Approx 200-300 trees, 35 years old, 6-8m clear trunks with a DBH between 600-800mm)

Several have been great with communication but the price offers have been truly abysmal..

We are getting an offer with a rough average price of NZ $200/ton for the logs delivered to the mill… given freight costs etc this would end up closer to $150/ton

It’s been quite a shock as this is even lower than we would receive in firewood prices..

So we now will consider looking into purchasing a mill and milling/drying etc ourselves but given the amount of work involved we may yet reach the conclusion that simply selling this beautiful timber as firewood is the better option.

A rather sad outcome given the hard work, love and dedication my father has poured into this forestry project over 35 years.

The disparity between what the consumer is asked to pay and what the growers are offered is just too big.. I have sympathy for the builder or house owner trying to put in beautiful blackwood flooring and being quoted tens of thousands of dollars while the price given to growers is a few hundred.

Once this is finally behind us next will come the question of what to plant next? Given the prices for blackwoods I can’t justify doing it again so we will perhaps give up on this industry and continue instead with firewood production which is selling for $300-$500 per ton.

Such a sad end to a wonderful project, the logs being mostly 8m clear will produce beautiful flooring, tables, desks etc but may never be given the chance to become anything more than ash in someone’s fireplace.

Thank you for your emails over the last year your work is appreciated and your site a wealth of knowledge.

Kindest regards

Jamie

Unfortunately Jamie’s experience is not unusual. In New Zealand, and to a much lesser extent in Australia, farmers have been planting and growing durable and decorative hardwoods and softwoods in the hope of one day selling their logs/timber into an appreciative timber market. After many decades that appreciative timber market is yet to appear. The hopes and dreams of those farmers are been destroyed.

Neither here in Australia nor in New Zealand has proper functioning timber markets ever developed.

Here in Australia there are 10,000’s of businesses that rely on a supply of durable and decorative timbers and I have yet to find a single business that expresses any interest in their future timber supply.

Trees take a while to grow. Much forward planning and work is needed if any timber will be available in the future. And 10,000s of businesses couldn’t care less. Is it wilful ignorance or head in the sand?

Even Australia’s biggest timber retailer @Bunnings expresses zero interest in the future supply of timber.

The timber market is heading for a catastrophic collapse in a few years time. That is 100% guaranteed. All decorative and durable timbers will have to be imported, assuming they are even available. Public native welfare forestry will end in Australia. That is 100% guaranteed.

After decades of hard work and waiting it would be an absolute travesty to see Jamie’s blackwood timber resource turned into firewood, and his father’s legacy destroyed. But that common story seems to be what the timber market wishes. The result of wilful ignorance!

The only future for durable and decorative hardwood and softwood timbers is with farm forestry. Fully commercial and profitable. That wont happen until the timber market wakes up!

TAKE HOME MESSAGE:

WAKE UP TIMBER MARKET!!!

2026 Tasmanian oak prices at Bunnings Hardware

Another year passes since I last looked at premium hardwood (Tas oak) prices at Bunnings hardware. Another year of pretty serious price increases in a timber resource plundered from Tasmanian public native forests at taxpayers expense.

You can read about the “at taxpayers expense” here:

https://tasfintalk.blogspot.com/2025/11/stt-another-year-of-deceptive-profits.html

So here is my updated chart:

These prices are for Select Grade Tasmanian oak. Prices have increased from 5 to 26% over the last 12 months.

These price increases should be causing an absolute revolution in the forest industry, in timber markets and in the farming community!

Instead all I hear is deathly silence!

Why isn’t the Australian timber market working like any other agricultural market? Increasing prices generally mean an increase in production as farmers look to cash in on low supply, high demand and high profits. That’s how markets work!! Basic economics!

The Australian forest industry and Australian timber markets have never followed basic economics.

You ask an Australian forester about costs and prices, supply and demand, products and markets and they will give you a blank stare in return.

Which is one reason why the Australian farming community has never been engaged to grow and supply premium timber for domestic markets.

And these extraordinary timber price increases are met with utter silence.

Not even Bunnings, Australia’s largest timber retailer, has any interest in engaging with the rural community.

https://www.bunnings.com.au/

Tasmanian oak prices at Bunnings Hardware

It’s been five years since I checked the prices of conflict-driven, welfare-dependent Tasmanian oak timber at Bunnings Hardware, Australia’s largest timber retailer. Given my previous post about timber prices after the shutdown of welfare forestry in West Australia and Victoria, I thought I should do an update.

https://www.bunnings.com.au/

Whoa!!! Look at that chart!!

It seems that as welfare public forestry is shut down in Australia, the price of hardwood timber has increased dramatically. Small sizes are now over $22,000 per cubic metre and the cheapest at $9,500 per cubic metre. These are massive price increases from 5 years ago!

These massive hardwood timber price increases should be sending ripples through the Australian farming community. So far I’ve seen no evidence that is happening! Why??

The future of the forest industry in Australia is with farm forestry. Surely these hardwood prices now make growing quality hardwood in private plantations a viable and profitable agricultural activity.

Why isn’t the farming community responding?

Australian hardwood timber prices double one year on from native forestry ban

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-12/australian-hardwood-timber-prices-double-wa-native-forestry-ban/104573916

I’ve just come back from a holiday in south west Western Australia, where I was reminded once again what great potential the region has for farmers to grow quality hardwoods, and I find this article in the news media!!

Hallelujah!!

Is this the beginning of a REAL forest industry in Australia??

Having put an end to public native WELFARE forestry, are we about to see farmers and the marketplace finally wake up and plant trees for our future wood supply?

I sincerely hope so!

Farm forestry has never really succeeded in Australia whilst State governments have been dominant growers and manipulators of the log marketplace. No farmer wants to grow trees in competition with politicians that’s for sure!

But now with public native welfare forestry in decline around Australia, the marketplace is starting to wake up and realise it is prepared to pay much higher prices for quality hardwood logs.

This powerful message needs to spread far and wide throughout the farming community in Australia.

If Australian sawmillers, log merchants and timber traders want Australian farmers to plant trees then they had better start pumping the market!!!

And instead of perpetually whinging all the time, the orthodox forest industry should instead get on board and focus on profitable farm forestry.

Good luck to Mr North from Walpole, WA! May his trees (and his bank balance) continue to grow!!

It is so good (and rare) to have a positive news story in the forest industry.

I can now spend the day with a smile on my face!

Please spread the news!

An industry in decline and utterly clueless

The future of the forest industry in Australia is with profitable private plantations.

There is no other future!

But the forest industry remains utterly and completely clueless how to create that future.

Having never in its history demonstrated a cent of commercial credibility, Australia’s forest industry remains on track for an irrelevant future.

The latest statistics from the Federal department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry show Australia’s plantation estate continuing to decline.

Soon that Federal department will have to be renamed the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries.

And therein lies part of the industry’s problem. Growing wood should be regarded by the rural community as standard agricultural practice, but Australia is a million miles from that cultural and economic change.

It should not be Agriculture and Forestry! It should just be Agriculture!!

But a declining forest industry sends a very loud and clear signal to the rural community that growing wood is not commercially viable.

As such the industry decline will only snowball, unless the industry can demonstrate commercial credibility. To date the forest industry has refused to do so!

https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/research-topics/forests/forest-economics/plantations-update

The future of the forest industry is NOT in the hands of politicians.

The forest industry is responsible for its own future.

So far there has been no evidence of this!

Tasmanian Forest Industry Demands Market Manipulation and Price Control

This is a very clear message to the Tasmanian farming community!

Plant trees at your peril!!

This is further to my previous blog, and tells us how utterly broken and corrupt is the forest industry in Tasmania, not to mention our political system.

Government forest policy in Tasmania (and the rest of Australia) has always been about subsidising sawmillers.

It has never been about profitable tree growing.

So here we are in the 21st century still implementing 19th century policy.

And if there is any challenge to that welfare policy the forest industry will scream bloody murder from the mountain tops!

The above link to the Tasmanian Times website provides all the blood-soaked details of the current forestry drama.

As I said in my previous blog, this drama could well end up in the High Court of Australia, with the Tasmanian government facing various commercial and trade practices charges, never mind a blatant breach of the Australian Constitution, which guarantees free trade between States.

As I stated previously, the Tasmanian forest industry does not want a transparent, competitive market for forest products in Tasmania.

The Tasmanian forest industry is demanding market manipulation and price controls to ensure Tasmanian businesses continue to enjoy unfettered access to forest welfare.

The letter from the Tasmanian Forest Products Association to the Tasmanian Premier is clearly and openly demanding that the State government deliberately breach Australia’s consumer and competition laws.

The fact that the State Labor opposition openly supports market manipulation and price control tells us that the forest industry probably does not have a future in Tasmania.

Anyone who is a forest grower will be horrified by this.

Someone needs to write a letter to the Tasmanian Premier threatening to take the Government to the High Court over this whole fiasco.

In fact a Royal Commission into trade practices within the forest industry is long overdue.

Blatant market manipulation

20230719_105036.jpgThis article appeared in The Mercury newspaper last Saturday the 15th July.

It’s a monster!

Terry Edwards is the old Tasmanian forest industry warhorse now retired. But old warhorses never really retire.

And here is Terry back beating the war drums once again.

This time it’s not “The Greenies” he is raging against but the State government!

How dare the Tasmanian State government not continue to subsidise the very welfare dependent forest industry.

How dare the Tasmanian State government sell it’s forest products onto the open commercial market, and not give them to local sawmillers.

It’s an outrage!!!

No! It’s the forest welfare industry doing what it has always done – cry poor and play politics!

It doesn’t say but I assume the sawlogs being discussed are the first harvest of Regional Forest Agreement pruned hardwood plantation sawlogs, that the local sawmillers said they weren’t interested in 25 years ago when they were planted.

My how times change! And old behaviours and attitudes don’t!

What Terry Edwards is saying is that the Tasmanian sawmillers don’t want to operate in a competitive commercial marketplace. They haven’t for 200+ years and they certainly are in no position to be competitive now. Two hundred years living on forest welfare has left the Tasmanian industry a complete basket case.

Subsidizing sawmillers has been government policy in Australia since 1788, which is why our forest industry today is now at deaths door.

The other message from Mr Edwards is about sawlog price control and manipulation. The forest industry does not want an open competitive market operating in Tasmania.

That is a very clear message to Tasmanian farmers to never plant a tree for the forest industry because you will never ever get a fair market price!

Terry Edwards wants the forest industry to wither and die.

I could also point out that what Mr Edwards is proposing is in breach of numerous commercial and trade practice laws. Those cashed up Victorian sawmillers may very well take the Tasmanian government to the High Court, and bring the whole facade crashing down.

Now that would be fun to watch!

Until we get all the welfare recipients and their supporters (like Mr. Edwards) out of the forest industry there will no future.

Creating a functional wood market in Australia

Farm grown blackwood timber at Ceres Fair Wood, Melbourne. $10,000 per cubic metre. Ceres Fair Wood is one of the few businesses in Australia that cares about the future of quality wood.

The Past/Present

For thousands of years humans have been using wood for all sorts of reasons – to hunt, cook, stay warm, build shelter and wage war. And for all that time we have had natural forests to plunder. Whatever wood we could find we used, mostly with plenty of contempt and waste.

But the days of plundering natural forests are just about over.

One of the problems this history has created is dysfunctional wood markets.

Cheap plentiful wood from natural forests has meant no one has ever taken responsibility for the future. Cutting down and sawing up trees is simple. Getting trees planted and managed for the future is the real challenge.

There are thousands of businesses in Australia that rely on wood (harvesting, transport, milling, retail, manufacture, craft, music, art, etc.), and 99.99% of them take no interest or responsibility in the future supply of wood.

There is no relationship in the market between using and consuming wood and a tree being planted and managed.

Third party certification schemes such as Responsible Wood/PEFC and FSC are not building the forest industry and growing more wood for the future. Their goal is to save and better manage existing natural forests, not to grow more new wood resources.

The fact that the forest industry in Australia has never established any commercial credibility hasn’t helped the situation.

There must be a credible, transparent relationship between the price of wood and the cost of planting, growing and managing trees; and that relationship must encourage and support more tree planting to meet future demand.

My focus here is especially the premium solid wood market.

Until we build proper functioning wood markets in Australia most of these Australian businesses will disappear. Some will switch to imported wood when public native welfare forestry is shut down, but many will close. All for the want of a proper functioning wood market.

The Future

There are plenty of challenges that need to be addressed in order to build proper functioning wood markets but they are not insurmountable.

  1. Possibly the first and greatest challenge is market (and consumer) recognition and responsibility.

Proper functioning wood markets in Australia must be driven by the market and consumers.

Recent comments in the media by furniture makers and builders in Western Australia (in response to the shutting down of public native forestry) do not provide encouragement. Can you believe they would rather import timber from Indonesia than support local farm forestry?

How the thousands of wood-dependent businesses in Australia will come together to coordinate and plan their future is part of this challenge. Most of these businesses are too small to achieve much by themselves. The Australian Furniture Association could take on this role for furniture makers. Builders, cabinet makers and retailers could possibly join the AFA in this.

https://australianfurniture.org.au/

Is the AFA up to the challenge?

2. The second challenge is getting the farming community on board to plant, grow and manage the trees that the market wants.

I personally think this second challenge is by far the easier of the two.

Once farmers see the market change to being responsible and supportive they will quickly get on board.

There will need to be some serious talking and building trust, and careful management of risk.

Unlike the past where the market could pick and choose from a wide variety of natural forest woods, the market must now decide on which species it wishes to promote and support in farm forestry. Species must be fast growing and command sufficient market price to allow farmers to grow them commercially. Given we are talking 30+ years between investment/planting and harvest/revenue/profit, this will require careful consideration, coordination and planning.

The idea that farmers just randomly plant hundreds of different tree species in the hope of finding a buyer in the future just wont work. Farm forestry for the growing of high quality premium solid wood will require coordination and planning, driven by the market.

This is where organisations like the AFA must play a central role.

Final some discussion about markets.

Will there still be demand for premium quality solid wood in 30+ years time?

Certainly over my 40+ year career as a forester I have seen premium quality solid wood go from a being a common cheap product to a scarce expensive product, with all indications leading to its eventual disappearance from the Australian market entirely.

I think this is primarily a supply issue, rather than one of demand.

I see sufficient evidence that the market is prepared to pay very high prices for quality solid wood.

The problem is that in a dysfunctional wood market, these price/demand signals don’t trigger a supply response as they should. If we had a strong farm forestry culture in Australia and proper functioning wood markets, these price/demand signals would be making front page news. That is where we need to get too!

So dear reader, what do you think?

Comments and ideas welcome.

If not native jarrah, where does WA get its hardwood?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10-29/jarrah-price-spike-spurs-indonesian-hardwood-imports/100575880

This is the conversation we should have been having 50 years ago when the forestry wars began!

These are the important questions that will determine the future of the forest industry in Australia.

The end of Public Native Welfare Forestry in Australia has been coming for decades. But so many people dependent on it have chosen to ignore this fact.

Most furniture makers and builders just expect quality timber to be in the marketplace ready to buy. They have no interest in securing their own future.

How do furniture makers support farm forestry? Will furniture makers and builders support farm forestry??

New Zealand farmers have been happily growing quality timbers including lots of different eucalypt species, and blackwood, for decades. Why can’t Australian farmers?

Why don’t Australian furniture makers support New Zealand farmers and buy New Zealand grown quality wood? New Zealand farmers would love to sell their quality wood to Australian furniture makers.

If New Zealand wants timber, New Zealand farmers grow it!!

Why can’t Australian farmers grow timber for Australia??

Australia has never had a proper forest industry. Nor has it ever had proper functioning wood markets.

It has all been welfare, ideological and political!!

Not an ounce of commercial reality anywhere!!

Imagine if Australian furniture makers got behind and supported farm forestry in Australia. Just imagine the huge transformation that would initiate!!

The argument that you can’t make quality furniture out of plantation timber is of course utter bullshit. It is part of the bullshit the forest industry says to justify plundering taxpayers and our public native forests.

“We’ve never been able to grow jarrah or karri well in plantations,” Mr de Fégely said.

That is true for Jarrah, but not true for Karri. Karri is a very fast growing eucalypt species. It has been grown in plantations in South Africa for almost a century.

When it comes to defending public native welfare forestry, the forest industry will completely disparage farm forestry.

The final comments from forestry head Rob de Fégely are utterly stupid.

Growing trees for wood production is NOT welfare, it is business!!

Mr de Fégely wants to keep defending the welfare forestry model.

It’s time we gave welfare forestry the flick!!

It is time to support farm forestry in Australia!!

Open letter: FSC is no longer fit for purpose and must urgently reform

You MUST read this letter!!

This letter speaks for itself!

https://www.earthsight.org.uk/news/blog-open-letter-fsc-no-longer-fit-for-purpose-and-must-urgently-reform

It certainly confirms my own experience with and observation of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) over the last 30 years.

The logging industry has taken over the FSC and corrupted it!

The PEFC/Responsible Wood is even worse!!

As a means of saving the world’s forests third party certification has failed!

This article in The Guardian is also relevant:

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/jul/16/ethical-labels-not-fit-for-purpose-report-warns-consumers

All of this is not surprising!

Paying someone else to manage your integrity, when there is money involved, was always bound to fail.

So how DO we save the world’s forests if third party certification isn’t the answer?