
Here’s an email I recently received from a client that raises a number of important issues.
There’s no point growing trees for timber production if there’s no market for the timber. It appears that in NZ and Tasmania there are a number of places that farm forestry growers could sell blackwood as log or possibly sawn. What’s available in Victoria? I asked this question recently of one Victorian agroforestry consultancy. They didn’t have an answer. There are some furniture manufacturers in Victoria who use blackwood so they might be interested in taking timber but I’m guessing only if it has been sawn and seasoned. Perhaps some of the timber sellers will buy from growers but again I suspect if it has been sawn and seasoned. There are markets such as the craft/hobby/specialists such as luthiers which will take small volumes. I guess they could be supplied directly, through WWW fora or by selling to distributors.
This lack of clearly defined sales opportunities for species beyond E. globulus and Pinus radiata (and some niche opportunities such as several species that the Yarram sawmill actively pursues) is IMO a serious impediment for farm forestry in Victoria generally. I raised this issue in a submission to the Vic farm forestry strategy initiative a year or so ago. Perhaps that initiative will lead to some clarity of what can be sold where in Vic. There was an excellent guide published in Qld some years ago, for example, that details what timber is required for what markets and what prices may be expected.
There’s a great deal I could say in reply to this.
There are various reasons why farm forestry has never taken off in Australia despite the AFG having being around since the late 1960’s when the industry was much bigger than it is today. To me the main reason has been poor forest policy and management, and above all a lack of commercial process and management. The forest industry until recently has been run as a sheltered workshop for a select few, centred around a public native forest and plantation resource. So no transparent, competitive markets have ever developed for wood products in Australia. Farmers have never been encouraged to become commercial tree growers through proper market processes and competitive, transparent prices.
With the steady decline in the industry over the last 40 years, and especially since the GFC, the few remaining markets are rapidly disappearing. Sawmillers have traditionally played “rent seeker” with State Governments, rather than behave in a rational commercial manner and engage all landowners (public and private) to grow and supply them with sawlogs. Remarkably they are still behaving as rent seekers even as they now face almost certain extinction. The political games will keep them alive but it will be a long slow painful death; much like a cat playing with a mouse.
We are fast approaching the point where the hardwood sawmilling industry in Australia will collapse and disappear, and will have to be rebuilt from scratch, as they are attempting to do in New Zealand. In this new environment, portable sawmills will play a major role. Here are two examples of what the future may look like:
http://www.northcoasttimbers.net/ based in north-coast NSW, and
http://mobilesawmilling.com/ based in SE Queensland.
I can’t imagine why similar businesses are not operating in Victoria, such as one in Gippsland, another in the north east, perhaps another working the Otway/Ballarat area. Farmers who have small volumes of logs to saw for their own use or to sell would readily make use of such a service. And the portable sawmill owners could develop a network of contacts in the market to on-sell sawn timber. Being small, portable and efficient seems to be the key to success.
I suspect that most of our eucalypt hardwoods will never be valuable enough to support investment beyond this basic level, supplying small local niche markets. Even where high-value species are concerned, such as blackwood, the future will be difficult, unless those species already have significant local and international market profile (such as blackwood). The timber volumes required by the local market will be small even if the prices might potentially be high. Unless enough of a species is grown to allow access to export markets, then it will just be local niche craft markets. It’s a “chicken and egg” situation. Scale of planting and log value against local and/or export markets. One can’t happen without the other.
It will be interesting to watch how NZ blackwood farmers develop towards a collective marketing model for their trees that are now reaching commercial maturity. They have enough potential volume to begin accessing export markets so the rewards could be very good if they succeed.
Selling small parcels of logs and single logs will always be difficult, even if they are excellent quality logs of premium timber.
The fact that our sawmillers aren’t in the marketplace aggressively looking to buy sawlogs from wherever they can source them is a great curiosity to me. I can only interpret this behaviour as meaning that the logs are just not worth buying. The value of the timber is just not worth the effort. There are plenty of sawmiller websites around but I have yet to find one that has a “Wanted to buy” sign out the front. They are all about what they have to sell. Despite the collapsing industry the remaining sawmillers think their future supply is 100% secure. Very curious!
People like Jon Lambert at Heartwood Plantations have a much more commercial focus and a different business model, but I think even they don’t push the market hard enough. I’d love to know what they think of the current situation.
While the forest industry in Australia avoids becoming hard-nosed commercial and remains bogged down in politics and ideology, then farm forestry will continue to be a hard road. You mention the new Victorian farm forestry strategy. I’ve seen so many strategies come and go over the years with no impact at all, I’m afraid I’ve little faith in political support anymore.
So coming back to a farmer/growers viewpoint, you need to think carefully about what you are trying to achieve, and that means understanding the factors that will help or hinder you selling your wood in the future. Planting a lot of different species might be fun and interesting, but when it comes time to sell, you will find very few buyers unless you have done your homework.
What are the main local markets for premium timber? Cabinetry, flooring, furniture, panelling??? I don’t think structural solid hardwood has any future. What little structural hardwood that the market wants will all come from reconstructed wood such as LVL. So what species can you grow to supply the flooring and panelling market? Etc., etc…
I’m comfortable promoting blackwood because it has a well established local market profile and a growing international profile. But I realise my time is limited. If the remaining forest industry crashes and burns, as seems likely, then getting a growers cooperative going will be that much harder. Blackwood has a great future, but for the foreseeable future the Kiwis will be the drivers and dominant players in the blackwood market.
Black Friday
Last Friday March 21st 2014 Will Hodgman Premier-Elect of Tasmania on behalf of the forest industry, and particularly on behalf of the special timbers industry, officially declared war on the Tasmanian community.
That was my immediate and clear response to this news item:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-21/no-detail-on-forestry-future-after-dumpoing-of-peace-deal/5336956?section=tas
Does the special timbers industry want to be part of this war?
Does the special timbers industry want to be used and manipulated as the reason for this war?
As a member of the special timbers industry trying to establish a business to help move the industry onto private land and away from the politics and conflict of public forest management I certainly do not!
In the last 30 years I don’t recall the forestry wars being so formally declared, not with such blatant hostility and certainly not with the forest industry as reluctant (?) participants. Poor Terry Edwards (FIAT Chief Executive) standing behind Mr Hodgman looks more like a refugee trying to escape a warzone than a General about to lead what remains of his troops. “The world has moved on.” Indeed it has!
Some people think this is just a war against “the greenies” or those who failed to vote Liberal this time. But conflicts affect everyone. There are never winners in conflict; everyone loses, some more than others, often the innocent are the biggest losers. And the last 30 years of the forestry wars have been littered with false hopes and promises, and thousands of innocent victims. Politicians come and go while the victims are piled higher.
The losers over the last 30 years have been the forests, the forest industry and the Tasmanian community. That fact should be obvious to everyone. This time is no different.
Having spent last weekend as an exhibitor at the inaugural Deloraine Stringfest, it became very clear to me that this may have been the first and last Stringfest. Stringfest is a celebration of Tasmanias world-class timbers, the craftspeople who turn them into musical instruments, and the artists who play them. I was the only exhibitor representing the first link in the chain back to the trees and the people who grow them. That link needs to be strengthened and promoted. Farmers as proud tree growers need to become an integral part of Stringfest if it is to grow and have a sustainable future. There was no one at Stringfest representing Forestry Tasmania and public native forest management.
I spent the weekend at Stringfest wearing a black armband in mourning for the forest industry and the people of Tasmania.
Landmark events such as Stringfest and the Wooden Boat Festival, which showcase special timbers, will be used by our politicians as weapons to escalate the conflict. Even retailers, consumers and artists will be used as pawns in the battle.
The special timbers industry, whether it likes it or not, is being used as a weapon against the Tasmanian community. Talking to people at Stringfest there was a wide range of opinions within the industry. There was certainly no possibility for consensus on a future strategy. Many were resigned to the wars as passive observers. Some in the industry have already moved their supply sources onto private land in an attempt to avoid the conflict. A few are even looking forward to the coming battle in the hope that they will succeed. The last 30 years clearly show that outcome is very unlikely.
Many people have a “why don’t they….?” or “if only they would….” attitude to the problem. “The forests are there, if only we could manage them properly, then everything would be ok and everyone would be happy”. This fairytale dream just won’t happen. If anything the real world has moved in the opposite direction. The more people hold onto this fairytale the worse the nightmare becomes. In my opinion this fairytale has now become part of the problem. We need to give up the fairytale and move on.
Many people will not accept my interpretation of these events. That’s fine by me. People believe what they want to believe. Everyone has a different view on life.
Does the special timbers industry, including retailers, artists and consumers, want to be used and manipulated as the reason for this war?
What is more important?
Continuing to have access to conflict-ridden, unsustainable, taxpayer-subsidised special timbers from our public native forests, or moving the industry onto private land and bringing peace and prosperity to Tasmania?
For some in the special timbers industry this transition will be impossible, but for many it is a very real alternative. Many have already made the transition.
Please don’t be a pawn in Mr. Hodgman’s political power games. It is time to decide!
2 Comments
Posted in Commentary, Markets, Politics, Tonewood