
Private Forests Tasmania (PFT) has just released an updated Tasmanian Primary Wood Processor Directory.
http://www.pft.tas.gov.au/index.php/publications/market-information
The directory is a listing of 45 of the estimated 57 primary wood processing businesses believed to be operating within the State of Tasmania at the time of publication.
The directory has been primarily developed to help private forest owners with logs for sale to identify potential buyers. As well as enabling the forest owner to more easily locate and contact primary wood processors, it also identifies the log types purchased by them.
The directory also helps the listed primary wood processors to source logs from the Tasmanian private forest estate.
It isn’t at all clear to me how the directory helps the listed primary wood processors to source logs from the Tasmanian private forest estate, but anyway….
18 of the 45 listed processors indicate that they want to buy blackwood logs from private landowners. To find these processors simply download and open the document in Adobe Reader. Once the document is open press the Ctrl+Shift+F keys together on your computer. In the search box type “blackwood” and hit the Search button. All 18 instances of the word “blackwood” will now be shown.
ERRATUM: My apologies! I have just realised that three of the primary processors in the Directory list “special species” without listing blackwood separately. I assume these three processors include blackwood in their definition of special species. So that makes a total of 21 of the 45 listed processors are looking to buy blackwood logs from private growers/farmers. That is a very crowded market!!
That there are so many sawmillers around Tasmania looking to buy blackwood logs from private landowners I find very encouraging.
Clearly there is good demand for blackwood timber.
But what size and quality logs, and at what price? What markets are these processors accessing? These are critical questions that need answers.
If blackwood is Australia’s premier appearance-grade timber species then how do we build this industry into something proud and profitable?
How do we get greater transparency and tradability into the blackwood market?
How do we put the blackwood market on steroids?
I don’t mean artificially inflate the demand. I mean create much greater transparency and tradability into the blackwood market so landowners start to see some realtime market activity. Only then will landowners begin to think about investing in the future of blackwood.
How do we get farmers to make a 30-40 year investment commitment to grow more blackwood for the future as both remnant blackwood forest and in plantations?
ANSWER: By giving farmers as much incentive and positive market sentiment and feedback as we possibly can. Once farmers begin to see the blackwood market operating like other rural commodity markets then we might have some hope.
Every day we see blackwood timber making its way to the very highest of the wood value-adding markets both in Australia and increasingly overseas. Markets such as premium furniture, veneers, and musical instruments. So why isn’t this market demand stimulating grower interest? Why doesn’t Tasmania have a thriving blackwood grower community? Is growing blackwood a profitable investment for a landowner?
These 18 sawmillers can help answer these fundamental questions.
How many of these 18 processors are thinking about the future of the blackwood industry as anything other than a clean-up salvage operation?
Are they waiting for the Government to solve the problems of the forest industry, or are they prepared to take responsibility themselves and take some action?
These blackwood sawmillers are fundamental to the future success of Tasmania’s blackwood industry. But things need to change and change radically.
At the moment the blackwood market is completely obscure, which inhibits growth and investment in the industry.
The day that I can write my first Blackwood Market Report for Tasmanian Country will be a significant day for the blackwood industry.
There is plenty of potential and many opportunities with blackwood provided Tasmanians are prepared to help see them happen.
What’s in it for these sawmillers?
- Access to more blackwood resource as more farmers participate in the market;
- Collective marketing with access to more diverse, larger, more profitable markets;
- Stronger links and relationships to both suppliers and buyers;
- Being part of an expanding, high-value, niche market.
Or are we going to surrender our blackwood heritage to the New Zealand farmers?
I would like to hear some thoughts and ideas from these blackwood sawmillers. Reply to this blog, or phone or email me so we can have a discussion.
Cheers!
Blackwood sawlogs achieve record price at auction REVISITED
Since it was first posted this blog has consistently been one of the most frequently visited by readers of this website.
http://blackwoodgrowers.com.au/2012/06/11/blackwood-sawlogs-achieve-record-price-at-auc/
Clearly it says something that readers find compelling.
In terms of its message and impact on the forest industry, State forest policy, the farming community or the media however there has been little response.
Profitable tree growing and transparent, competitive market processes remain completely irrelevant to State forest policy and the forest industry.
If we treated our dairy, beef and vegetable industries in such a manner Tasmania would be in serious trouble. But the forest industry remains a victim of its heritage dominated by politics, a public resource and a community service ethos.
Does Tasmania want a forest industry? If so then the price of logs and profitable tree-growing must be at the centre of policy and management.
So how can Tasmania move towards a fully commercial and profitable forest industry?
The industry does not need more behind-closed-door deals, nor more reports and strategies. The industry needs to demonstrate serious commercial muscle, and a burning desire to leave the politics and conflict behind.
So tell me readers, why is this blog of such interest to you?
PS. Here’s a thought bubble!
Imagine what the forest industry would look like today if 100 years ago we had included prizes (trophy or ribbon) in our regional agricultural shows for the best sawlogs, in the same way we have prizes for livestock, wool fleeces, fruit, veges, etc. Farmers who managed their forest or plantations would bring in their very best dressed sawlogs to get judged. All of the entries could then be auctioned off.
Imagine a rural community that took as much pride in forest/plantation management is it does in beef, sheep, wool, vegetables, etc. That of course would depend on the marketplace supporting and rewarding such a community attitude, as the marketplace does for most other primary industries.
What do you think? Comments?
Leave a comment
Posted in Commentary, Prices